Home > blog > Sudoku Digit Rule

Sudoku Digit Rule

sudoku digit rule
Is there any mathematical measure to determine the complexity of a SuDoku puzzle?

I love solving sudoku puzzles ranging from easy to hard. I have observed that easier ones have >30 digits pre-filled, while harder ones have <26 digits pre-filled. However, this is more of an observation than a rule. e.g. Hard puzzles still appear difficult at times, even when I have managed to fill in 5-6 blank spaces. Of course, there comes a point when the sparseness is substantially reduced, and it looks trivial thereafter. Naturally, there is more to the complexity of a sudoku than just the # of pre-filled digits. Perhaps the arrangement or pattern?

I think the difficulty level classifications are based on the maximum amount of logic that will be required to solve that particular puzzle. An easy puzzle will never require forward-thinking, and the hardest puzzles may require you to think a few steps ahead. That is to say, on the hard ones, you will always reach a point where you cannot proceed any further unless you are able to solve multiple parts of the grid simultaneously.

You are correct that both the number of pre-filled digits, and their arrangement dictate the difficulty. You will always be given at least enough digits to ensure that there is one and only one solution. The mathematics involved are actually much more complex than it might seem.

The wiki on this subject is quite excellent (see link below). It says in that article that 17 is the absolute minimum number of digits that must be supplied to ensure a unique solution. Also, there are more than 6*10^21 possible ways of filling a standard Sudoku grid.

Law Matters – Valensi Rose PLC – #3 Selling Your Home



Categories: blog Tags:
  1. December 17th, 2011 at 06:33 | #1

    Hello there, just changed into aware of your blog through Google,my site is

  2. December 18th, 2011 at 12:36 | #2

    I just couldn’t leave your site prior to suggesting that I extremely loved the usual info an individual supply in your visitors? Is going to be back frequently in order to check out new posts

  3. December 19th, 2011 at 12:12 | #3

    remarkable things here. I am very glad to see your post. Thank you a lot and i’m having a look ahead to touch you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

  4. December 23rd, 2011 at 18:18 | #4

    Thank you, I have recently been looking for information about this subject for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out so far. But, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you positive concerning the supply?

  5. December 24th, 2011 at 16:38 | #5

    Wow, marvelous blog layout! How lengthy have you been running a blog for? you make blogging look easy. The entire glance of your web site is wonderful, let alone the content material!

  6. December 25th, 2011 at 18:01 | #6

    I simply couldn’t leave your site before suggesting that I really loved the usual information a person supply for your guests? Is gonna be back ceaselessly to check up on new posts

  7. December 27th, 2011 at 06:07 | #7

    Thank you for any other informative website. The place else may just I get that type of information written in such a perfect method? I’ve a project that I am simply now operating on, and I have been on the glance out for such info.

  8. December 29th, 2011 at 07:02 | #8

    It is really a nice and helpful piece of information. I¡¯m happy that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

  9. January 12th, 2012 at 07:54 | #9

    What¡¯s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I’m hoping to give a contribution & aid other users like its helped me. Good job.

  1. No trackbacks yet.